HARMONY COTTAGE Church Street, Bexhill, Bexhill-on-sea, East Sussex, TN40 2HE Data via plota.co.uk

Approved RR/2025/967/P
Council
Date received
week of 25 Aug 2025
Decision date
week of 27 Apr 2026
Postcode
TN40 2HE

Description

Siting of a small shepherds hut within the front garden for use as a holiday let and a yurt within the rear garden for use as a small business running wellbeing courses (part year). (retrospective). Data via plota.co.uk

Last checked

Planning committee

Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 16 Apr 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the amended proposal would not harm the conservation area, neighbours or highway safety.
  • Residents raised concerns about noise, smoke, parking, overlooking, permanence and the structures’ appearance.
  • The committee voted 6–3 to grant temporary permission for two years so neighbouring impacts could be monitored.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officer assessment, objections, committee debate, vote and temporary permission conditions. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes of 16 Apr 2026.

Site constraints 4

30 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 6-10, Church Street, Grade II, about 1 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade II*, 29 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 30 with distances
Historic England ↗
Bexhill Old Town conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Public footpath about 16 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Inside the Bexhill-on-Sea built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 18 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026