The Wetlands Sodbury Lane Westerleigh South Gloucestershire BS37 8RR Data via plota.co.uk

DOC26/00076 - Discharge of Conditions Decided

Proposal

Discharge of condition 5 (submission and compliance with TPP) attached to planning permission . Demolition of existing dwelling. Erection of 1no self build dwelling with associated works. (Resubmission of ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Mar 2026
✓
Discharge of Conditions Decided
8 Apr 2026

Discharge of Conditions Decided on 8 Apr 2026 · Fully Delegated · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Associated applications 4

  • Part of

    FullRefusedcouncil archive

Site constraints 3

Green belt: Bath and Bristol
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Gloucestershire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
BS37 8RR
Received
2 Mar 2026
Validated
2 Mar 2026
Ward
Boyd Valley
Parish
Dodington Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Apr 2026
Decision
Discharge of Conditions Decided
Decision date
8 Apr 2026
Decision level
Fully Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Rackham Planning Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14744414
Planning Portal ref
PP-14744414
Comments by
26 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
27 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Gloucestershire
Planning Authority Score
2.8/10
Poor
#239 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Gloucestershire ranks #178 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. South Gloucestershire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 83% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 83% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Gloucestershire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #210 of 296
83%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #263 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #178 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #195 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
220 decided (1-9 homes)
93%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
105 decided
1,585
Total decisions
245 refused in the year to March 2026