Land West Of, 82 Lower Bagthorpe, Bagthorpe, Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

V/2025/0530 Pending

Proposal

Self build dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Sept 2025
Decision
Target date was 18 Nov 2025

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 28 Oct 2026; it is now day 399.

Documents 1

Statements & assessments 1

PDF Name hidden Show Document · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Lower Bagthorpe conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 191 m away: Bagthorpe Meadows SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Brinsley and Underwood built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Ashfield - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

2 Oct 2026Pending

221 Alfreton Road, Underwood, Nottinghamshire, NG16 5GX

Proposal for two dwellings

V/2026/0606
30 Sept 2026Pending

Mexborough House, 151 Lower Bagthorpe, Bagthorpe, Nottinghamshire, NG16 5HF

Conversion and extension of existing barn to create an annexe ancilliary to the ...

V/2026/0612
29 Sept 2026Pending

Mexborough House, 151 Lower Bagthorpe, Bagthorpe, Nottinghamshire, NG16 5HF

Two storey extension to rear and side, roof reconfiguration, porch, demolition o...

V/2026/0608
15 Sept 2026Pending

., 97A Alfreton Road, Underwood, Nottinghamshire

Proposal for double garage

V/2026/0592
3 Sept 2026Pending

83 Lower Bagthorpe, Bagthorpe, Nottinghamshire, NG16 5HF

Replacement roof with steeper pitched roof with dormers to create additional bed...

V/2026/0541
6 Aug 2026Pending

235 Alfreton Road, Underwood, Nottinghamshire, NG16 5GX

Outline planning application with all matters reserved for demolition of 235 and...

V/2026/0484

Important details

Council
Ashfield
Received
24 Sept 2025
Validated
24 Sept 2025
Ward
Underwood
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Nov 2025
Applicant
Show
Agent
The Planning & Environment Studio

Decision outlook

Day 399, past the statutory target. 83% of full applications in Ashfield are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 26 Oct 2026.

Day 399343 days past the 56-day target
62%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
156decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Ashfield in the last twelve months, from validation. Ashfield decision record →

Ashfield
Planning Authority Score
5.5/10
Average
#118 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Ashfield is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #83 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Ashfield decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #215 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #238 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #83 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #82 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
65 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
43 decided
425
Total decisions
69 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings