72-bedroom care home at 45 Church Street, Buckden, St Neots
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Huntingdonshire Development Management Committee on 14 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed demolishing the existing care home and building a 72-bedroom care home with access, parking, landscaping and infrastructure.
“1 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 It is proposed that the Committee RESOLVES That planning permission be granted subject to conditions as set out in Appendix 2. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 This application seeks planning permission for the demolition of the existing care home and construction of a 72-bedroom care home (Use Class C2), with associated access, parking, plant, landscaping and site infrastructure.”
Officer report
The site and building
The site contained an operating 39-bedroom care home on a 4,483-square-metre property, and the replacement would be three storeys with 26 parking bays.
“3 SITE AND THE PROPOSAL 3.1 The development site is located at Goldenley Care Home, 11-13 Richmond Avenue, Benfleet SS7 5HE. It comprises the full extent of a 4,483-square metre property, measuring approximately 77 metres deep and 80 metres wide, and is sited on the southern side of the sharp bend in Richmond Avenue.”
“3 3.7 A driveway extends from the vehicle access to the building. Eight car parking bays are between the building and the road reserve. A power sub-station and informal external storage areas are located near the car parking area. A residential apartment complex, known as Richmond Court, is across the western side boundary. A 6-metre-wide strip of land is across the northern boundary, and a detached double storey dwelling is to the north of this strip of land.”
Officer report
Earlier advice and changes
Earlier advice supported increasing residents, subject to addressing amenity, parking, resident rehousing, trees and construction matters; revised plans addressed the ground slope.
“The advice related to a proposed care home development with associated access, car parking and landscaping, comprising a part two-storey part three- storey, 73-resident care home with 30 car parking spaces, including two accessible parking bays, and eight sheltered cycle parking spaces.”
“A dedicated plan to re-house the residents during construction and within the new home, if agreeable to the residents, should be provided as part of a planning application. A tree survey and construction management plan would be desirable to ensure that any mature trees to be kept are to be adequately protected during construction.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Statutory consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while Adult Social Care supported the need, design, access and care facilities.
“However, the development would generate a greater benefit for residents in the borough in the long-term through an enlarged caring capacity and modern facilities. There is no evidence that the development would cause a loss in its family atmosphere or that care quality would drop.”
“20 9.12 General support for the proposal, including comment of pre-application discussions between the applicant and Adult Social Care. Comment that the Essex Supported and Specialist Housing and Accommodation Need Assessment (2025) estimates that the need for residential and nursing care home provision in Castle Point is to increase from 84 rooms in 2029 to 227 rooms in 2044.”
Officer report
Members’ discussion
Members welcomed the additional care provision and were satisfied that construction impacts and existing residents’ wellbeing were addressed through conditions.
“In response to Members' questions, officers clarified matters relating to care home provision within the Borough, vehicle charging infrastructure, water efficiency measures, parking provision, vehicle manoeuvrability, construction impacts, site levels and highway considerations. Officers confirmed that no objections had been received from the relevant statutory consultees.”
“During debate, Members welcomed the additional care home provision, noting the identified need for such facilities within the Borough. Whilst acknowledging concerns regarding construction impacts and the wellbeing of existing residents during redevelopment works, Members were satisfied that these matters had been addressed through the proposed conditions.”
Minutes
The committee vote
A motion to grant permission in accordance with the officer recommendation and conditions was agreed on a show of hands.
“A Motion moved by Cllr K Bowker and seconded by Cllr J Huntman, that planning permission be granted in accordance with the officer recommendation and subject to the conditions set out in Appendix 2 of the report, was agreed on a show of hands.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Whilst acknowledging concerns regarding construction impacts and the wellbeing of existing residents during redevelopment works, Members were satisfied that these matters had been addressed through the proposed conditions.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Huntingdonshire Development Management Committee minutes, 14 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Huntingdonshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Huntingdonshire
- Date
- Tuesday 14 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Huntingdonshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.