Front porch extension at 4 Silver Lane, Billingshurst

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Horsham Planning Committee on 7 Apr 2026.

DC/26/0019Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing the existing glazed porch with a larger porch and changing the front roof line, window, roof lights and staircase.

“Planning permission is sought for the replacement of the existing glazed front porch with a new porch extended forward to align with the front elevation of the garage.”

“The proposal incorporates alterations to the front roof line whereby the existing pitched roof over the garage would extend over the enlarged porch, and would replace the front-facing first-floor window serving the staircase. Two Velux roof lights would be inserted, and the internal staircase reconfigured. Concrete profiled roof tiles are to be used to match existing. Brickwork and clay tile hanging is also to match existing house.”

Officer report

The site

The site contains a detached two-storey house with an integrated garage, a driveway for up to four cars and earlier extensions.

“The application site contains a detached two-storey dwelling which is set back south of Silver Lane within the Billingshurst built-up area boundary.”

“The original dwelling has a dual pitched roof, gabled at the sides, and contains an integrated single garage which projects forward of an attached glazed porch with mono-pitched roof. The driveway provides off-street parking space for up to 4 cars.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier permissions covered a rear extension, revised first-floor materials and a conservatory at the property.

“DC/11/0227 Non-material amendment to permission Ref. No. DC/10/2232 consisting of revised first floor external materials Application Permitted on 18.03.2011”

“DC/10/2232 Two storey and single storey extension to rear Application Permitted on 09.12.2010”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the proposal a suitably subservient design that matched the house, protected neighbours’ amenity and retained sufficient parking.

“The proposal would be a clearly subservient addition and is considered to be of a design, form and scale which is appropriate to the character and appearance of the existing dwelling, and which would not harm the character or appearance of the wider area. It is therefore considered that the visual impact of the proposal is acceptable and would accord with the above policies.”

“It is considered that extended porch and the resulting relationship with adjoining properties would be sufficient to prevent any unacceptable harm to neighbouring amenity, with no new intrusive overlooking to neighbouring properties and land created. No driveway parking space would be lost with the off-street parking spaces remaining sufficient for the property.”

Officer report

What members considered

Members noted the planning history, and the ward member did not vote on the application.

“[As a Ward Member for Billingshurst Councillor John Trollope did not vote on this application]”

“Members noted the planning history of the application.”

Minutes

The committee decision

The committee approved the application in accordance with the officer recommendation.

“That DC/26/0019 be approved in accordance with officer recommendation.”

Minutes

Conditions of approval

Approval included approved plans, a three-year commencement period and matching materials and finishes for the new external works.

“2 Standard Time Condition: The development hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”

“3 Regulatory Condition: The materials and finishes of all new external walls, windows and roofs of the development hereby permitted shall match in type, colour and texture those of the existing building.”

Officer report

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Paul Clarke Conservative, Anthony Frankland Lib Dem, Clive Trott Lib Dem

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Horsham Planning Committee minutes, 7 April 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Horsham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Horsham
Date
Tuesday 7 April 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
12Lib Dem 6Conservative 3Green 3Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

49 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →