Historic Ruin at SX 573 468, Noss Mayo Data via plota.co.uk

3700/25/FUL - Full Planning Application Under Consideration

Proposal

Repair & reinstatement of historic belvedere at Beacon Hill & establishment of private tea house Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Decision
Target date was 27 Feb 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 29 Oct 2026; it is now day 300.

The consultation period closed on 12 Feb 2026.

Going to planning committee

Wednesday 28 October, 10am

South Hams Development Management Committee

Council Chamber - Follaton House

Item 6a on the agenda

Officers recommend refusal

The committee will decide this application in public. Most councils let objectors, supporters and the applicant speak if they register in advance, each by its own deadline.

Source: South Hams's committee agenda. The council can change the date or the agenda up to the meeting.

Documents 61

Consultation & comments 25

PDF Supporting Information Comment from Agent · 2 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Response to South Devon National Landscape comments Supporting Information · 14 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Lorna Sherriff - Objection · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Peter Ropner - Support · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Mark Tinsley - Support · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Daniel Williams - Support · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Robert Ward - Support · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Daisy Perry - Support · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Rose Perry - Support · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Cilla Perry - Support · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Document · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Document · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Robin Forrester - Support · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning Comment Attachment Robin Forrester - Support · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Paul Chivers - Support · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response - Internal EH Comments · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support John Mildmay-White - Support · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF DCC Historic Environment Consultation Response Document · 26 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Humphrey Gravell - Support · 26 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Nick Fothergill - Support · 25 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support James Acworth - Support · 25 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Siobhan Hayles - Support · 24 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Newton and Noss Parish Council - Support Consultation Response - Parish · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Ed Haddon - Support · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Chris Forrest - Support · 9 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 10

4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Lych Gate Approximately 40 Metres South South East of Church of St Peter, Grade II, about 10 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade II*, 3 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
South Devon National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Heritage coast: South Devon
A defined stretch of undeveloped coastline.
Development inconsistent with keeping the coast undeveloped is resisted.
Public footpath about 24 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Special area of conservation about 189 m away: Plymouth Sound & Estuaries
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Noss Mayo built-up area; Priority habitat about 36 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Hams - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
South Hams
Application type
Full Planning Application
Received
18 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Ward
Newton & Yealmpton
Parish
Newton and Noss
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show
Agent
Building Projects

Decision outlook

Day 300, past the statutory target. 95% of listed building works in South Hams are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 21 Oct 2026.

Day 300244 days past the 56-day target
79%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
173decided in the last year

Plota live figures for listed building works decided by South Hams in the last twelve months, from validation. South Hams decision record →

Public comments

20comments received
2 objecting18 supporting

90% support · above the UK average of 16%

Last counted 21 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
6 Jan 2026
Comments by
12 Feb 2026
Committee
28 Oct 2026
South Hams
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#89 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Hams is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #97 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Hams decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #116 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #165 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #97 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #69 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
130 decided (1-9 homes)
70%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,018
Total decisions
101 refused in the year to March 2026