9 Kingsend Ruislip Data via plota.co.uk

36969/APP/2025/2303 Approved

Proposal

Facade alteration for the installation of On Demand Grocery Hatch (ODG) at ground floor level, with associated parking space for delivery vehicles (Description Amended) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Sept 2025
✓
Approved
22 Jan 2026

Approved on 22 Jan 2026 · Last checked 12 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Hillingdon Planning Committee on 14 Jan 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the hatch and parking space would not harm design, neighbours or highway safety, subject to conditions.
  • A resident raised concerns about delivery riders using a pedestrian footpath, while consultees raised no objection subject to controls.
  • Members unanimously approved the application after discussing disabled parking and management of possible antisocial behaviour.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, committee debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Hillingdon's committee minutes of 14 Jan 2026.

Site constraints 6

Article 4 direction
Residential extensions. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Town centre: Ruislip
A designated centre in the London Plan.
Shops, services and active frontages are protected in centres, and main town centre uses are steered here first.
Conservation area about 21 m away: Ruislip Village
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Also on the record
3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Hillingdon built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 4 (good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 13 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Hillingdon - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Hillingdon
Received
3 Sept 2025
Validated
3 Sept 2025
Ward
RUISLIP 2022
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jan 2026
Decision
Approval
Decision date
22 Jan 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 141 days from validation, 78 days slower than Hillingdon's median of 63 for full applications. Approved, as 88% of full applications here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
88%approved
1,425decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Hillingdon in the last twelve months, from validation. Hillingdon decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
17 Sept 2025
Comments by
18 Dec 2025
Hillingdon
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#219 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Hillingdon ranks #194 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (90%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Hillingdon decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #208 of 296
90%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #191 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #194 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #190 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
67 decided (1-9 homes)
65%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,680
Total decisions
255 refused in the year to March 2026