Willoughby Almshouses Church Lane Cossall Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/00071/LBC - Listed Building Consent - Alterations Approved

Proposal

Construct communal covered parking to rear of Almshouses. Provide associated layout & landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
21 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
27 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
15 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
16 Apr 2026

Approved on 16 Apr 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Broxtowe Planning Committee on 15 Apr 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the rear carport would cause low-level harm outweighed by benefits to the listed building’s conservation and reuse.
  • The Conservation Officer and Parish Council raised no objections, while no objections were received through the site notice.
  • The Committee approved the proposal subject to conditions after discussing the site, parking and support for the historic building.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, committee discussion and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Broxtowe's committee minutes of 15 Apr 2026.

Site constraints 9

Grade II* listed: Willoughby Almshouses and adjoining boundary wall
List entry 1247951 · 16 m away · 5 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade II*, 4 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 5 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Cossall conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Heritage at risk 15 m away: Willoughby Almshouses and adjoining Boundary Wall, Church Lane; Local nature reserve 379 m away: Nottingham Canal; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Broxtowe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Broxtowe
Application type
Listed Building Consent - Alterations
Postcode
NG16 2RW
Received
4 Feb 2026
Validated
21 Feb 2026
Ward
Awsworth, Cossall & Trowell
Parish
Cossall Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Apr 2026
Decision
Conditional Permission
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Julian Owen Associates Architects

How this decision compares

Decided in 54 days from validation, 4 days slower than Broxtowe's median of 50 for extensions. Approved, as 96% of extensions here are.

83%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Broxtowe in the last twelve months, from validation. Broxtowe decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14236171
Planning Portal ref
PP-14236171
Consultation
27 Feb 2026
Comments by
27 Mar 2026
Site or press notice
4 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
18 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Broxtowe
Planning Authority Score
8.4/10
Excellent
#16 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Broxtowe is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #48 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Broxtowe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #35 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #52 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #48 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #48 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
42 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
92%
Change of use approved
36 decided
479
Total decisions
29 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use