New Gardens Cottage Ledwell Road Great Tew Chipping Norton Oxfordshire OX7 4AF Data via plota.co.uk

26/00322/S73 - Removal or Variation of Condition/s Approved

Proposal

Variation of conditions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of planning permission to allow for a new access to be created into the site together with the addition of a new phasing condition. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
10 Feb 2026
Validated
11 Feb 2026
Approved
7 Apr 2026

Approved on 7 Apr 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 19 Jul 2026

Associated applications 4

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions varied

Site constraints 6

Public footpath 18 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Registered park or garden 16 m away: Great Tew
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Conservation area 57 m away: Great Tew Conservation Area; Priority habitat 18 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Oxfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Removal or Variation of Condition/s
Postcode
OX7 4AF
Received
10 Feb 2026
Validated
11 Feb 2026
Ward
Kingham, Rollright and Enstone
Parish
Great Tew
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 May 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
7 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
JPPC Planning Consultants

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14683191
Env. assessment
No
West Oxfordshire
Planning Authority Score
7.1/10
Good
#60 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

West Oxfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #81 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Oxfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #33 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #46 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #81 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #135 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
105 decided (1-9 homes)
72%
Major dwellings approved
18 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
1,125
Total decisions
59 refused in the year to March 2026