Land to the West of the Mainline Railway line and North of Toddington Road, Harlington Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/02570/SDOC - S106 DOC Decided

Proposal

Discharge of Section 106 Agreement obligations attached to planning permission . Discharge relates to affordable housing in relevant phase 2a & 2b Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
17 Aug 2026
✓
Discharge of Condition Decision Released Condit…
20 Aug 2026

Discharge of Condition Decision Released Condit… on 20 Aug 2026 · Last checked 18 Oct 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Outlinecouncil archive
    • ConditionsDischarge of Section 106 Agreement obligations. Discharge relates to affordable housing…This applicationCB/26/02570/SDOC

Site constraints 3

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
S106 DOC
Received
14 Aug 2026
Validated
17 Aug 2026
Parish
Harlington
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 Oct 2026
Decision
Discharge of Condition Decision Released Conditions or Reasons: There are no conditions Informative Notes: There are no informative notes
Decision date
20 Aug 2026

Public comments

1comment received
1 objecting

Last counted 18 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
17 Aug 2026
Comments by
25 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
4 Sept 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026