Nestle Haxby Road York YO91 1XY Data via plota.co.uk

26/00454/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Installation of pedestrian and cyclist access gate, alterations to the existing car park and installation of new cycle shelters Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
13 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
15 May 2026

Approved on 15 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Documents 25

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Article 4 direction
HMO. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Conservation area about 68 m away: New Earswick Conservation Area; Priority habitat about 7 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in York - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
York
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
YO91 1XY
Received
10 Mar 2026
Validated
13 Mar 2026
Ward
Guildhall
Parish
Guildhall Planning Panel
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 May 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
DLP Consultants

How this decision compares

Decided in 63 days from validation, 14 days faster than York's median of 77 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 77% of commercial and major works here are.

39%decided within 8 weeks
77%approved
32decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by York in the last twelve months, from validation. York decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14604912
Planning Portal ref
PP-14604912
Comments by
3 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
8 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
York
Planning Authority Score
3.7/10
Below average
#213 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

York ranks #156 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
York decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #255 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #237 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #156 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #168 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
104 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
68 decided
1,278
Total decisions
224 refused in the year to March 2026