BP Orsett Cock Petrol Station Westbound Stanford Interchange To Orsett Cock Roundabout Westbound Stanford Le… Data via plota.co.uk

26/00265/FUL - Full Planning Permission Application Awaiting decision

Proposal

Installation of 6 no. electric vehicle (EV) parking bays and 3 no. EV charging units, together with associated electrical infrastructure including a substation, LV feeder pillar (enclosed within a timber fence), LMS cabinet and network cabinet. The EV charging area will be located within an existing wooded area forming part of the site and will be accessed via the creation of an additional vehicle lane. A new pedestrian route will be provided to connect the EV charging bays to the existing fuel station shop. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Decision
Expected by 12 May 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 20 Oct 2026; it is now day 206.

Comments are open until 20 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 63

Plans & drawings 37

PDF PROPOSED LMS CABINET Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED NETWORK CABINET Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EV CHARGER Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED METERING CABINET Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SUBSTATION Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED TIMBER ENCLOSURE Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SITE SECTIONS Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE ELEVATIONS Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SIGNAGE Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED PROTECTION & BOLLARD DETAILS Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED LINING Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EXTERNAL FINISHE Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING SITE PLAN Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCATION PLAN Current Plan · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PLAN LIST Other · 18 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN Current Plan · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SECTIONS Current Plan · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SITE PLAN Current Plan · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SECTION. Consultee Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCATION PLAN Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EXTERNAL FINISHES Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED LINING Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED PROTECTION AND BOLLARD DETAILS Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SIGNAGE Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE ELEVATIONS Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED TIMBER ENCLOSURE Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SUBSTATION Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED METERING CABINET Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EV CHARGER Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED NETWORK CABINET Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED LMS CABINET Superseded Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF TREE CONSTRAINTS PLAN Current Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF TREE PROTECTION PLAN Current Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PLAN VIEW ELEVATION - ROADSIDE RANGE TYPE O Current Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PLAN VIEW ELEVATION Current Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF TYPE E BOLLARD Current Plan · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
National infrastructure project: Lower Thames Crossing
The site is inside the project boundary. Highway, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: Norwich to Tilbury (examination closed, recommendation due, about 102 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Thurrock - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Thurrock
Application type
Full Planning Permission Application
Postcode
RM16 3BJ
Received
9 Mar 2026
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Ward
OLD Orsett
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 May 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Smith Design Associcates

Decision outlook

Day 206, past the statutory target. 78% of full applications in Thurrock are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 5 Oct 2026.

Day 20612 days to the predicted decision (day 218)
44%decided within 8 weeks
83%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Thurrock in the last twelve months, from validation. Thurrock decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 neutral

16 neighbours consulted · Last counted 5 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
20 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
12 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Thurrock
Planning Authority Score
6/10
Average
#104 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Thurrock is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #25 out of 296. Thurrock is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Thurrock decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #252 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #271 of 296
84%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #25 of 296
31%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #62 of 296
65%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
43%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
43 decided
671
Total decisions
124 refused in the year to March 2026