Normans Daccombe Devon TQ12 4ST Data via plota.co.uk

26/00531/VAR - Vary or remove Condition under S73 Approved

Proposal

Variation of Condition 5 on Planning Permission (Replacement dwelling, detached garage and garden room) relating to landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
25 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
27 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
20 May 2026

Approved on 20 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 5 varied

    • VariationVariation of Condition 5 (Replacement dwelling, detached garage and garden room) relating…This application26/00531/VAR

Site constraints 3

9 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Appleacre Including Adjoining Cob Wall to South-West, Grade II, about 1 m from the postcode pin · 9 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 9 with distances
Historic England ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Teignbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Vary or remove Condition under S73
Postcode
TQ12 4ST
Received
25 Mar 2026
Validated
27 Mar 2026
Ward
Kerswell-with-Combe
Parish
COFFINSWELL
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 May 2026
Decision
VARY CONDITION APPROVAL
Decision date
20 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Coastal Building Design Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14808938
Planning Portal ref
PP-14808938
Statutory expiry
22 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Teignbridge
Planning Authority Score
6.1/10
Average
#102 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Teignbridge is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #39 out of 296. Only 26% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Teignbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Teignbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
80%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #262 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #270 of 296
80%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #39 of 296
26%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #37 of 296
60%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
13 decided (10+ homes)
69%
Change of use approved
13 decided
716
Total decisions
141 refused in the year to March 2026