Swan Cottage Mill Lane Stonnall Walsall Staffordshire WS9 9HN Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Conversion and extension of a former stable building to a Pilates and wellness studio Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
23 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
1 May 2026
✓
Approved
15 May 2026

Approved on 15 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Documents 30

Statements & assessments 18

PDF _ arboricultural officer - ldc Consultation Responses · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Preliminary ecological appraisal Amended Information · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF _ ecology manager - ldc Consultation Responses · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity net gain assessment Amended Information · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF _ ecology manager - ldc Consultation Responses · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-aia - arboricultural impact assessment Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-tcnlp-tree constraints new layout plan Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-tcp-tree constraints plan Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-tip-tree impact plan Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-tpp-tree protection plan Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ael-19406-a-tsp-tree shadow plan Arboricultural Survey / Report · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Preliminary bat roost assessment Ecological Survey / Reports · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Q16540 bes swan cottage Ecological Survey / Reports · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Q17013 preliminary ecological appraisal Ecological Survey / Reports · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 25.227 planning statement - stables at swan cottage mill lane lower stonnall Planning Statement · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Q17013 biodiversity net gain assessment - sam george v1 Biodiversity statement · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Strutural assessment - md1014 report 20-2-26 - Structural Survey · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 2728601baccessappraisal Transport Assessment · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath about 9 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Purple Horizons; Radon affected area, class 4; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Priority habitat about 13 m away: Traditional orchard.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £355,000 in October 2000. Detached house, freehold.

6 October 2000£355,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Lichfield - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Lichfield
Application type
Change of Use
Postcode
WS9 9HN
Received
17 Mar 2026
Validated
23 Mar 2026
Ward
Little Aston And Stonnall
Parish
Shenstone
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 May 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 53 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 62% of changes of use here are.

83%decided within 8 weeks
62%approved
44decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Lichfield in the last twelve months, from validation. Lichfield decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
1 May 2026
Comments by
11 May 2026
Site or press notice
27 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
18 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Lichfield
Planning Authority Score
7.1/10
Good
#57 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Lichfield is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #3 out of 296. Only 10% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (85%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Lichfield decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #250 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #251 of 296
97%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #3 of 296
10%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #3 of 296
66%
Minor dwellings approved
87 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
62%
Change of use approved
39 decided
716
Total decisions
131 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.