4 Cedar DriveRavenfield 0004 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2026/0799 Refused

Proposal

Application to vary conditions 02 (approved plans) & 03 (materials) to allow changes to the external materials and removal of chimneys imposed by Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 6 Sept 2026, 11:07

Street View

Application progress

✓

Received

9 Jun 2026

✓

Validated

18 Jun 2026

✗

Refused

5 Aug 2026

Appeal

Not lodged

Refused on 5 Aug 2026 · Delegated (Part 2A) · Last checked 6 Sept 2026

Documents 1

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF Decision Notice Document · 5 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

Part of

8 Feb 2024council archive

Conditions variation sought for 2, 3
- VariationApplication to vary conditions 02 (approved plans) & 03 (materials) to allow changes…RefusedThis application18 Jun 2026RB2026/0799

Site constraints 7

Surface water flood risk

National infrastructure project 602 m away: Whitestone Solar Farm

The site is 602 m from the project boundary. Generating station, accepted for examination.

Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.

Planning Inspectorate project page ↗

Surface water flood riskCouncil record

Recorded by the council for this site.

Council site ↗

Also on the record

Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Wickersley and Bramley built-up area; Green belt 48 m away: South and West Yorkshire; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council: Rotherham
Received: 9 Jun 2026
Validated: 18 Jun 2026
Ward: Bramley & Ravenfield Ward
Parish: Ravenfield
Case officer: Show
Decision: REFUSED
Decision date: 5 Aug 2026
Decision level: Delegated (Part 2A)
Applicant: Show

Consultation & key dates

Consultation: 9 Jun 2026
Comments by: 29 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry: 13 Aug 2026

Rotherham

Planning Authority Score

4.7/10

Below average

#167 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils

only 71% approved vs 90% nationally

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Rotherham decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

79%

Overall approval rate

Below avg (87%) #266 of 296

71%

Householder approved

Below avg (90%) #295 of 296

72%

Decided in 8 weeks

Above avg (63%) #107 of 296

32%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #68 of 296

78%

Minor dwellings approved

63 decided (1-9 homes)

100%

Major dwellings approved

20 decided (10+ homes)

83%

Change of use approved

58 decided

750

Total decisions

156 refused in the year to March 2026