Land To The South Of Moor Street And East Of Meresborough Road Rainham Data via plota.co.uk

MC/25/2538 - Outline Application Refused

Proposal

Outline planning application (with all matters reserved other than access) for up to 150no. dwellings, including public open space, landscaping and associated works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
16 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
25 Mar 2026
✓
Committee
1 Jul 2026
✗
Refused
29 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 29 Jul 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 30 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 1 Jul 2026.

Refused

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because the scheme would harm heritage assets, countryside, landscape, agricultural land and required contributions.
  • Residents objected to loss of open land, landscape and wildlife, pressure on infrastructure, traffic, drainage and harm to heritage assets.
  • Members agreed with officers, refusing the application for five reasons and referring it to the Secretary of State.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, committee discussion, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes of 1 Jul 2026.

Documents 57

Statements & assessments 3

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 12 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 12 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF BNG METRIC Supporting Documents · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 51

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 13 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 13 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 13 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 9 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 6 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 6 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 27 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 27 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 24 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 24 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 24 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Letter of Representation · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Grade II listed: The Cowls the Oast the Press
List entry 1259681 · 30 m away · 2 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Moor Street conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Public footpath 12 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Gillingham (Medway) built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 1, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Medway - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Medway
Application type
Outline Application
Received
29 Dec 2025
Validated
16 Jan 2026
Ward
Rainham South East
Case officer
Show
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
29 Jul 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
DHA Planning

How this decision compares

Decided in 194 days from validation, 138 days slower than Medway's median of 56 for new homes. Refused, as 28% of new homes here are.

58%decided within 8 weeks
72%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Medway in the last twelve months, from validation. Medway decision record →

Public comments

21comments received
19 objecting2 neutral

90% object · above the UK average of 75%

26 neighbours consulted · Last counted 30 Jul 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14543867
Neighbours
22 Jan 2026
Consultation
25 Mar 2026
Comments by
17 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
28 Jan 2026
Committee
1 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Medway
Planning Authority Score
9.2/10
Excellent
#3 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Medway is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #8 out of 296. Only 19% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Medway decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #99 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #53 of 296
94%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #8 of 296
19%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #16 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
106 decided (1-9 homes)
78%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
67 decided
999
Total decisions
88 refused in the year to March 2026