Kirkleatham Stable Block Kirkleatham Lane Kirkleatham Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0218/F3 - Regulation 3 Approved

Proposal

Installation of full metal perma security screening to ground and first floor doors/windows Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
31 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
1 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
6 Aug 2026
✓
Committee
2 Sept 2026

Approved on 6 Aug 2026 · Last checked 14 Sept 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Redcar and Cleveland Regulatory Committee on 2 Sept 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the reversible screening would secure the heritage asset while respecting the building and conservation area.
  • The conservation advisor had no objection subject to a time limit, and no public representations were received.
  • The committee granted permission subject to three conditions, including removal of the screening by 1 September 2031.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Redcar and Cleveland's committee minutes of 2 Sept 2026.

Site constraints 1

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Regulation 3
Postcode
TS10
Received
31 Mar 2026
Validated
1 Jun 2026
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANT DEEMED CONSENT
Decision date
6 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council

How this decision compares

Decided in 66 days from validation, 11 days slower than Redcar and Cleveland's median of 55 for extensions. Approved, as 95% of extensions here are.

75%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
149decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redcar and Cleveland in the last twelve months, from validation. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
3 Jun 2026
Comments by
27 Jul 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026