Lower Kit Brow Farm Kit Brow Lane Ellel Lancaster Lancashire LA2 0QH Data via plota.co.uk

26/00085/DIS - Submit Details Reserved by Condition Decided

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 3 (Archaeology Requirements), condition 4 (Contamination), condition 5 (Sustainable Design Statement), condition 6 (Materials) and condition 9 (Visitor Information Pack) on approved application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 May 2026
✓
Consultation
22 May 2026
✓
Split Decision
16 Jul 2026

Split Decision on 16 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 17 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsDischarge of conditions 3 (Archaeology Requirements), condition 4 (Contamination), condition 5…This application26/00085/DIS

Site constraints 3

In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Lancaster - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Lancaster
Application type
Submit Details Reserved by Condition
Postcode
LA2 0QH
Received
21 May 2026
Validated
21 May 2026
Ward
Ellel Ward
Parish
Ellel
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Jul 2026
Decision
Split Decision
Decision date
16 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
ML Planning Consultancy Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14549545
Planning Portal ref
PP-14549545
Consultation
22 May 2026
Comments by
13 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
16 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Lancaster
Planning Authority Score
5/10
Average
#147 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Lancaster is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #84 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Lancaster decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #237 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #231 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #84 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #130 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
45 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
48 decided
717
Total decisions
122 refused in the year to March 2026