73 King Edward Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6HY Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Lawful development certificate (Proposed) for the construction of a single storey rear extension, a rear dormer roof extension and installation of two roof-lights to the front roof slope. Data via plota.co.uk
Other new applications on this street
153 Edward Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6PA
Construction of dormer roof extension to main rear roof (with French doors and s...
56 Edward Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6LU
Variation of condition 2 (approved plans) attached to planning permission refere...
First Floor Flat, 128 Edward Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6NX
Construction of a rear dormer roof extension and installation of two roof-lights...
Nearby new applications
153 Edward Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6PA
Construction of dormer roof extension to main rear roof (with French doors and s...
ARLEY WORKS, 33 Sutherland Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6BH
Part retention of existing building with proposed upward extension, rear single ...
13 Chewton Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DW
Submission of details pursuant to condition 9 ( Sustainable Design & Energy Effi...
16 Gainsford Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6QB
Prior approval for the construction of two extensions (i) single storey rear inf...
10 Renness Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6EX
Lawful development certificate (Proposed) for the construction of a single store...
41 Elmsdale Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 6PN
Construction of a single-storey rear infill extension.
Historical activity at this location
25 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Nearby activity
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #80 out of 296. Only 22% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.
