Site Of Former Workshop Rear Of Post Office Six Ashes Bridgnorth Shropshire WV15 6EQ Data via plota.co.uk

26/01672/FUL - Full Planning Application Refused

Proposal

Proposed new dwelling (cross boundary application) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 May 2026
✓
Consultation
16 May 2026
✗
Refused
8 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 8 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 11 Jul 2026

Site constraints 7

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Public footpath about 30 m away; Radon affected area, class 4; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat about 47 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Shropshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Shropshire
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
WV15 6EQ
Received
13 May 2026
Validated
13 May 2026
Ward
Bridgnorth South And Alveley
Parish
Alveley And Romsley
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Jul 2026
Decision
Refuse
Decision date
8 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Jones Chartered Architects Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, about the council's usual 56 days. Refused, as 44% of new homes here are.

53%decided within 8 weeks
56%approved
174decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Shropshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Shropshire decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
11 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
16 May 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Shropshire
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#53 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Shropshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #53 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Shropshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #179 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #136 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #53 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #50 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
350 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
35 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
27 decided
2,083
Total decisions
273 refused in the year to March 2026