Land To The West of V1/Snellshall Street, North of H7/Chaffron Way And South of Whaddon Road, Kingsmead South, Milton Keynes Data via plota.co.uk

PLN/2026/0709 - Modification or discharge of a Planning Obligation Under Consultation

Proposal

The modification of a planning obligation under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 dated 22 August 2007 made between The Commission for the New Towns, Milton Keynes Council, Urban Regeneration Agency and relating to permission ref. , seeking to substitute para 7.6 (a) of Schedule 2 with NHF precedent Mortgagee in Possession wording… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
2 Apr 2026
Validated
5 May 2026
Decision
Expected by 29 Jun 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 29 Jun 2026.

Documents 14

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

2 Article 4 directions
Article 4 Direction relating to Houses in Multiple Occupation (HIMO) - Non immediate direction · Article 4 Direction relating to Houses in Multiple Occupation (HIMO) - Immediate direction. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Milton Keynes - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Modification or discharge of a Planning Obligation
Postcode
MK4
Received
2 Apr 2026
Validated
5 May 2026
Ward
Tattenhoe
Parish
Shenley Brook End
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Clarke Willmott - Laura Urch

Public comments

1comment received
1 neutral

Last counted 11 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Milton Keynes
Planning Authority Score
7.1/10
Good
#59 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Milton Keynes is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #52 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Milton Keynes decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #156 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #159 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #52 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #45 of 296
55%
Minor dwellings approved
66 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
71%
Change of use approved
49 decided
1,088
Total decisions
134 refused in the year to March 2026