Chase Park Church Lane Hatherton CANNOCK WS11 1RR Data via plota.co.uk

26/00362/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Erection of 6 No. Padel Courts in place of existing tennis courts Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
5 May 2026
✓
Approved
11 Jun 2026

Approved on 11 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National landscape about 226 m away: Cannock Chase; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Staffordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
WS11 1RR
Received
22 Apr 2026
Validated
22 Apr 2026
Ward
Huntington & Hatherton
Parish
HATHERTON
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Jun 2026
Decision
APPROVED Subject to Conditions
Decision date
11 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Foster Architecture & Design

How this decision compares

Decided in 50 days from validation, 12 days faster than South Staffordshire's median of 62 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 74% of commercial and major works here are.

44%decided within 8 weeks
74%approved
6%go to committee

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by South Staffordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. South Staffordshire decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14865134
Planning Portal ref
PP-14865134
Neighbours
5 May 2026
Consultation
5 May 2026
Comments by
5 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
15 May 2026
Statutory expiry
17 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Staffordshire
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#220 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Staffordshire ranks #179 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 49% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Staffordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #211 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #180 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #179 of 296
49%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #222 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
75 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
23 decided
612
Total decisions
89 refused in the year to March 2026