City Of London Primary Academy, 15 Baltic Street West, London, EC1Y 0AE Data via plota.co.uk

P2026/1082/NMA - Non-Material Amendment Approved

Proposal

Non-material amendment to Planning permission ref: , dated 19/07/2018 as amended by dated 17/05/2024. The proposed amendments comprise of amendments to condition 65 to permit the use of the playground on four occasions per year, outside of the approved time frames. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
30 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
8 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
17 Jul 2026

Approved on 17 Jul 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 3 Aug 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions , , 65, varied

    • AmendmentNon-material amendment, dated. The proposed amendments comprise of amendments to condition 65…This applicationP2026/1082/NMA
    • Show 1 more · 1 approved
      • Amendmentarchive

Site constraints 21

Article 4 directionBunhill & Clerkenwell Area Action PlanCAZHeathrow Safeguarding AreaCritical Drainage Group3_003Central Activities ZoneRichard Cloudesley School, Golden Lane, EC1Y 0TJBunhill, Barbican and Golden Lane Healthy NeighbourhoodAPA MoorfieldsWithin 50m of St Luke'sWithin 50m ofSt Luke's
COA00000577 conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Heritage at risk: St Lukes
On the register of historic places assessed as at risk.
A designated building, monument, park or conservation area assessed as at risk from neglect, decay or development. Proposals that secure its future are looked on favourably.
Historic England ↗
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Islington AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Registered park or garden 11 m away: Golden Lane Estate Designed Landscape
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Central activities zone
The core of central London in the London Plan.
Offices, culture and the other strategic functions of the centre take priority over new housing here.
13 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Hatfield House, including garden walls to rear, Grade II, 45 m away · 1 Grade II*, 12 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 13 with distances
Historic England ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Bunhill & Clerkenwell Area Action PlanCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
CAZCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Heathrow Safeguarding AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Critical Drainage Group3_003Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Central Activities ZoneCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richard Cloudesley School, Golden Lane, EC1Y 0TJCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Bunhill, Barbican and Golden Lane Healthy NeighbourhoodCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
APA MoorfieldsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Within 50m of St Luke'sCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Within 50m ofCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
St Luke'sCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Islington built-up area; Designated open space 26 m away.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Islington - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Islington
Application type
Non-Material Amendment
Postcode
EC1Y 0AE
Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Ward
Bunhill
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 May 2026
Decision
Non-material amendment(s) agreed
Decision date
17 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14884020
Comments by
28 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
8 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Jun 2026
Islington
Planning Authority Score
2.9/10
Poor
#237 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Islington is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #260 out of 296. 53% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Islington decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #132 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #130 of 296
43%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #260 of 296
53%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #241 of 296
89%
Minor dwellings approved
499 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
1 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
19 decided
1,488
Total decisions
167 refused in the year to March 2026