Highfields Farm Arger Fen Bures St Mary Bures Suffolk CO8 5BN Data via plota.co.uk

DC/25/05192 - Full App Without Compliance of Condition Approved

Proposal

Application under Section 73A of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Removal of Condition 3 (Agricultural Occupancy Restriction) of planning permission dated: 05/02/1981 - Erection of agricultural dwelling and construction of vehicular access. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
27 Nov 2025
✓
Consultation
27 Nov 2025
✓
Approved
18 Feb 2026

Approved on 18 Feb 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Local nature reserve about 139 m away: Arger Fen
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 139 m away: Arger Fen SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
National landscape about 72 m away: Dedham Vale
Outside the landscape; its setting can still be raised.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
National infrastructure project about 949 m away: Bramford to Twinstead
The site is about 949 m from the project boundary. Electricity line, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 7 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full App Without Compliance of Condition
Postcode
CO8 5BN
Received
26 Nov 2025
Validated
27 Nov 2025
Ward
Bures St Mary & Nayland
Parish
Bures St Mary
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Jan 2026
Decision
Granted
Decision date
18 Feb 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Acorus Rural Property Services

How this decision compares

Decided in 83 days from validation, 40 days slower than Babergh Mid Suffolk's median of 43 for amendments. Approved, as 94% of amendments here are.

82%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
249decided in the last year

Plota live figures for amendments decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. Babergh Mid Suffolk decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14514665
Planning Portal ref
PP-14514665
Neighbours
1 Dec 2025
Consultation
27 Nov 2025
Comments by
2 Jan 2026
Site or press notice
12 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
22 Jan 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026