Agricultural Buildings East Of 3 Blue Ball Cottages Blue Ball Road Ripponden Sowerby Bridge Calderdale Data via plota.co.uk

26/00262/FUL - Full Application Refused

Proposal

Re-development of existing lawful buildings to form one dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
12 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
✗
Refused
23 Oct 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 23 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 24 Oct 2026

Documents 24

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 4; 1 listed building within 150 m.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Calderdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Calderdale
Application type
Full Application
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
12 Apr 2026
Ward
Ryburn
Parish
Ripponden Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
23 Oct 2026
Decision
Refuse
Decision date
23 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
PICKLES ARCHITECTURE

How this decision compares

Decided in 194 days from validation, 138 days slower than Calderdale's median of 56 for demolitions. Refused, as 22% of demolitions here are.

52%decided within 8 weeks
78%approved
48decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Calderdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Calderdale decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 neutral

7 neighbours consulted · Last counted 24 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14797068
Planning Portal ref
PP-14797068
Neighbours
28 Apr 2026
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
Comments by
12 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
20 May 2026
Statutory expiry
7 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Calderdale
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#240 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Calderdale ranks #193 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Calderdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #192 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #229 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #193 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #223 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
103 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
61 decided
856
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026