Garage gym at 8 Stonedale Skelton-in-Cleveland, Saltburn-by-the-Sea
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Redcar And Cleveland Regulatory Committee on 19 Mar 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective conversion of a domestic garage into a fitness and wellbeing gym, with a French door added to the side.
“Permission is sought for change of use of domestic garage (Use Class C3) to gym for fitness and wellbeing (Use Class E); addition of French door to side (retrospective).”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Nine objections raised concerns about the location, traffic, parking, activity and noise, while 55 supporters cited the business’s benefits and available parking.
“Unsuitable location. • Commercial gym is not suitable for a small residential cul-de-sac. • A business with multiple daily visitors affects the character of the area. • Increase in traffic. • Street not designed for this level of traffic. • Speed of vehicles is a concern. • All the support is not from local residents or neighbours to the application site. • Activity from 6am. • Parking issues. • Restrictive covenants. • How can planning override the covenant.”
“Small businesses should be encouraged. • Development would not be detrimental. • Use is a valuable resource for their clients. • Support the application. • Ample parking at the property. • Would not cause disturbance. • It is a great business with many benefits for its customers. • A five bed property could generate parking and vehicular traffic at a similar level to the small business. • The business really helps its clients. • 1:2:1 training is very beneficial.”
Officer report
What the applicant said
The applicant described a small, low-impact 1:2:1 service without classes or loud music, with on-site parking and no intention to expand.
Members’ discussion
Members were reassured by the seven-year operation without complaints, the health benefits, and restrictions on 1:2:1 sessions and expansion.
“clarify how many people would be at the property at any one time? • How long have you been at your current property and did you move to accommodate the running of the business; • Are you currently seeing clients; • Had there been any complaints in relation to noise or had there been any interaction with the Council with regard to noise? • Had there been any contact with Environmental Health?”
“The applicant had been operating for 7 years without any complaints having been received; • It was common practice with the advances in IT for businesses to be conducted from residential properties especially.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee resolved to grant planning permission subject to approved plans, opening-hour, session-limit, operator and parking conditions.
“RESOLVED that Planning Permission be granted subject to the following conditions:-”
“Location Plan received by the Local Planning Authority on 09/01/2026 Garage floor plan received by the Local Planning Authority on 12/01/2026 Proposed side elevation received by the Local Planning Authority on 12/01/2026”
Minutes
Sources
- Redcar And Cleveland Regulatory Committee minutes, 19 March 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Redcar And Cleveland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Redcar And Cleveland
- Date
- Thursday 19 March 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Redcar And Cleveland committee decisions →
This committee's year
16 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.