Old Hall House Ladyfield RoadThorpe Salvin Rotherham 9999 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2026/0431 Approved
Extensions & alterations

Proposal

Erection of a single storey side extension Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Validated
23 Mar 2026
✓
Received
24 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
15 May 2026

Approved on 15 May 2026 · Proposed to be Delegated · Last checked 6 Sept 2026

Documents 1

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF Decision Notice Document · 15 May 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 10

2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Ruins of Thorpe Salvin Hall, Grade II*, about 28 m from the postcode pin · 2 Grade II*
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Thorpe Salvin conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Scheduled monument about 7 m away: Thorpe Salvin Old Hall
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
National infrastructure project about 308 m away: Whitestone Solar Farm
The site is about 308 m from the project boundary. Generating station, accepted for examination.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Heritage at risk about 7 m away: Thorpe Salvin Old Hall (ruins of), Ladyfield Road; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Thorpe Salvin built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

15 Sept 2026Pending

The Piggery Little Wood Lane Thorpe Salvin Worksop

Erection of a farmworkers dwelling house and garage

RB2026/1108

Important details

Council
Rotherham
Postcode
S80 3JT
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
23 Mar 2026
Ward
Anston & Woodsetts Ward
Parish
Thorpe Salvin
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision level
Proposed to be Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
CS Surveying & Architectural Design Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 53 days from validation, 4 days slower than Rotherham's median of 49 for extensions. Approved, as 89% of extensions here are.

81%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
403decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
24 Mar 2026
Comments by
23 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
2 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
18 May 2026
Rotherham
Planning Authority Score
4.7/10
Below average
#167 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 71% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rotherham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #266 of 296
71%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #295 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #107 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #68 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
58 decided
750
Total decisions
156 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings