House extensions and alterations at 28 Moore Street, Chelsea, London SW3

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee on 23 Jun 2026.

PP/26/00038Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a roof extension, rear and infill extensions, window changes, roof plant, a roof terrace and rear garden landscaping.

“/PP/26/00038:1 THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 23/06/2026 REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND PLACE Application: PP/26/00038 Agenda Item: S044 Address:28 Moore Street, LONDON, SW3 2QW Proposal: Erection of additional storey with roof mounted condenser units within acoustic enclosure, replacement ground floor closet wing extension, ground floor infill extension.”

“/PP/26/00038:2 3.The site and its surroundings 3.1 This application relates to a four-storey, mid-terrace property on the eastern side of Moore Street. 3.2The property forms part of a group of terraced houses at nos.22-42 and is located within the Chelsea Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Main planning issues

The assessment considered conservation area character, neighbouring amenity, transport, flooding, overheating and trees.

“6.5The decisive issues are: iWhether the development would respect the context, character, and appearance of the host property, the wider area, and the wider Conservation Area; iiWhether the development would continue to maintain good living conditions for neighbouring occupiers; iiiWhether the development would have an acceptable impact in terms of transport; and ivWhether the development would safeguard the existing trees on site.”

“/PP/26/00038:7 recommended to ensure that the replacement tree and shrubs are planted within the first planting season. The proposals would therefore comply with Local Plan policies GB14 and GB16.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Environmental health, transportation and arboricultural officers raised no objections subject to conditions, while three letters objected.

“A statutory notice advertising the application was posted near the site on 13/03/2026. 7.2Three letters were receivedobjecting to the application, summarised as: CommentResponse 1Character and Appearance The size of the acoustic housing to the proposed AC units as drawn would rise significantly above the front roof parapet and will be directly visible from the upper floors of the Moore street terrace opposite.”

“3No prior community engagement exercise has been undertaken. While applicants are encouraged to engage with their neighbours prior to submitting an application, this is not a statutory requirement. Other consultees and organisations ConsulteeCommentWhere in the report this is considered Director of Environmental Health No objection, subject to conditions.6.24 Director of TransportationNo objection, subject to condition.6.27”

Officer report

Residents’ concerns

Objectors raised concerns about the acoustic enclosure, roof terrace, daylight, noise, dust and the absence of prior community engagement.

“Given this reduced size and the unit’s set back placement to the middle of the proposed roof, the unit would not be considered to have a detrimental impact on private and public views within the conservation area. Exact specifications, including the design and materials of the acoustic housing would be secured via a condition. Each application must be assessed on its own merits and in this case the size and positioning of the AC units would be acceptable.”

“The applicant’s assertion (on the site construction management plan form) that “no noise activities are anticipated” and that “no dust generating activities are anticipated” is demonstrates a complete absence of any concern for the neighbours. Given the proposals would include extensions up, down and out, among many other building works, it is unlikely that this can be achieved silently and free of any dust. neighbouring terraces.”

Officer report

Who spoke

There were no speakers for this item.

The committee’s decision

The committee unanimously granted planning permission with the conditions listed in the officer recommendation.

“Resolved unanimously: planning permission be granted with the conditions listed in Section 9 of the report.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee minutes, 23 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Kensington And Chelsea's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 23 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Councillors
5Conservative 4Lab Co-op 1Show councillors
Public speakers
None
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

156 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 8 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →