CHURCH FARM HOUSE Church Lane, Salehurst, Robertsbridge, East Sussex, TN32 5PJ Data via plota.co.uk

RR/2026/0189/LBC - Listed Building Consent Approved

Proposal

Replacement of patio doors in rear extension. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
20 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
10 Jul 2026

Approved on 10 Jul 2026 · Delegated decision · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Documents 28

Plans & drawings 3

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF LocationPlan.pdf Site Location Plan · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗

Other documents 21

PDF Woodworm picture window lintel.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Woodworm secondary opeing lintel.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Woodworm main opeing lintel.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage secondary opeing RHS.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage seondary opening base.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Ceiling Damp.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage main opeing base.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage secondary opening LHS.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage main opeing RHS.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Damage main opeing LHS.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Photo picture window.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Photo secondary opeing.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Rear of property.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Photo rear of property 2.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Photo main opeing.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Illustration secondary door opening from inside.png Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Illustration non opening picture window from inside.png Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Door example 1.jpg Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Illustration main opening from inside.png Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Illustration all windows and doors from inside.png Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Main opeing double french door and side lights.JPG Photographs · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

9 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: The Parish Church of St Mary, Grade I, about 2 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade I, 8 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 9 with distances
Historic England ↗
High Weald National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Article 4 direction
Town and Country Planning (County of East Sussex) Direction, 1959. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Public footpath about 12 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £825,000 in October 2025. Detached house, freehold.

16 October 2025£825,000
26 January 2006£440,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rother
Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
TN32 5PJ
Received
11 Feb 2026
Validated
20 Mar 2026
Parish
Salehurst
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 May 2026
Decision
LISTED BC GRANTED
Decision date
10 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 112 days from validation, 35 days slower than Rother's median of 77 for extensions. Approved, as 92% of extensions here are.

31%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
555decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Rother in the last twelve months, from validation. Rother decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
15 May 2026
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.