Preston Manor Clay Works Kingsteignton TQ12 3PR Data via plota.co.uk

26/01421/DCC - DCC Consultation Pending Consideration

Proposal

- DCC Consultation on the discharge of Cond 14 and 15 (Noise Management) in relation to the application - Consultation from Devon County Council on county matter application for consolidating planning application for the winning and working of permitted mineral reserves, associated development and progressive restoration of the Central Area of the Bovey Basin Clay Workings, Kingsteignton, Devon (DCC Ref ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
10 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 1 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 1 Oct 2026.

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    OutlineApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 14, 15 awaiting decision

    • ConditionsDCC Consultation on the discharge of Cond 14 and 15 (Noise Management) in relation…This application26/01421/DCC

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 5
Very poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Predicted from the national soil map. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 135 m away: Southacre Clay Pits SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 12 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Teignbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
DCC Consultation
Postcode
TQ12 3PR
Received
10 Sept 2026
Validated
10 Sept 2026
Ward
Kingsteignton West
Parish
KINGSTEIGNTON
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 11 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
DCC/4344/2023
Statutory expiry
1 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Teignbridge
Planning Authority Score
6.1/10
Average
#102 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Teignbridge is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #39 out of 296. Only 26% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Teignbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Teignbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
80%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #262 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #270 of 296
80%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #39 of 296
26%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #37 of 296
60%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
13 decided (10+ homes)
69%
Change of use approved
13 decided
716
Total decisions
141 refused in the year to March 2026