5 Broad Hey Close Lathom Skelmersdale Lancashire WN8 8BY Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0602/FUL - Full Planning Application Approved

Proposal

Construction of a single storey rear extension and partial garage conversion. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
15 Jul 2026
Validated
17 Jul 2026
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
Approved
11 Sept 2026

Approved on 11 Sept 2026 · Delegated unless Member request to Cttee · Last checked 12 Sept 2026

Documents 19

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3a, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). From a field survey (Wolverhampton). The older provisional map had this area as grade 1; the survey is the definitive reading.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Skelmersdale built-up area; Green belt 68 m away: Merseyside and Greater Manchester.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Lancashire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
WN8 8BY
Received
15 Jul 2026
Validated
17 Jul 2026
Ward
Rural South Ward
Parish
Lathom South
Case officer
Show
Decision
Planning Permission Granted
Decision date
11 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated unless Member request to Cttee
Applicant
Show
Agent
David Machell Architecture Ltd.

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, 4 days faster than West Lancashire's median of 60 for extensions. Approved, as 84% of extensions here are.

44%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
210decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by West Lancashire in the last twelve months, from validation. West Lancashire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

6 neighbours consulted · Last counted 12 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14637776
Neighbours
21 Jul 2026
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
Comments by
13 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
West Lancashire
Planning Authority Score
1.1/10
Poor
#291 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

West Lancashire is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #265 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. West Lancashire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 85% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 85% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Lancashire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #253 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #252 of 296
41%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #265 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #271 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
34 decided
564
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026