115 Arlesey Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, SG5 4HE Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/01112/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Single storey front and rear extension and rooflights with first floor side extension, replacement windows throughout with additional side elevation window. Render finish to existing and proposed walls Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
9 Apr 2026
Approved

Approved on · Last checked 13 Sept 2026

Site constraints 1

Also on the record
Inside the Stotfold built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
SG5 4HE
Received
9 Apr 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Parish
Stotfold
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Jun 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting: The application site is a two-storey detached dwelling located along Arlesey Road in Stotfold. The proposal is for the erection of single storey front and rear extensions and a first floor side extension above the existing garage. The proposal includes replacement windows throughout, an additional side window, and render finish to existing and proposed walls. The proposed front and side extensions would be visible within the streetscene. Whilst the dwelling forms a small group of three similar dwellings, the wider area is characterised by dwellings of a variety of scales and designs, with existing examples of materials and styles similar to the proposal. The proposed development would seek to remodel the existing dwellinghouse, which is acceptable. The design choices of the proposed development would be found acceptable within the setting, and whilst a first-floor side extension would normally be required to be set down from the roof ridge and set back from the front elevation, it would be set off the shared boundary by 1 metre to ensure there would not be a 'terracing effect' and the proposed render finish and front extension would ensure there is not a mix of brickwork. Arlesey Road has a very mixed street scene, with examples of development similar in appearance to the proposed development. It is considered on balance that the proposal, because of the material choices, and existing surrounding development is unlikely to result in any detrimental harm to the character and appearance of the area or the host dwelling. In terms of neighbouring amenity, proposed extensions would be sited approximately 1 metre from the shared boundaries with Nos.113 and 117 Arlesey Road. There is existing built form of outbuildings along the shared boundary belonging to No.117, and therefore this neighbouring dwelling would be sufficiently screened from the proposal. The proposed rear extension would bring the rear of the host dwelling in line with the rear elevation of No.113, as such this neighbouring dwelling will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposal in terms of loss of light or overbearing impact. In addition, there is a window proposed in the side elevation, which would serve a bathroom. A condition has been imposed to ensure that the window is obscurely glazed to ensure there is no loss of privacy to No.113. All other neighbouring dwellings are sufficiently separated and/or screened and would not be detrimentally impacted in terms of loss of light, loss of privacy or an overbearing impact. The proposal would increase the number of bedrooms at the property. A four-bedroom dwelling would be required to provide three off-street parking spaces. The application site benefits from a large driveway to the front of the property and therefore it is unlikely that the proposal will negatively impact the public highway or the off-street parking on site. Stotfold Town Council were consulted on the application and had no objection. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).Reasons for Granting: The application site is a two-storey detached dwelling located along Arlesey Road in Stotfold. The proposal is for the erection of single storey front and rear extensions and a first floor side extension above the existing garage. The proposal includes replacement windows throughout, an additional side window, and render finish to existing and proposed walls. The proposed front and side extensions would be visible within the streetscene. Whilst the dwelling forms a small group of three similar dwellings, the wider area is characterised by dwellings of a variety of scales and designs, with existing examples of materials and styles similar to the proposal. The proposed development would seek to remodel the existing dwellinghouse, which is acceptable. The design choices of the proposed development would be found acceptable within the setting, and whilst a first-floor side extension would normally be required to be set down from the roof ridge and set back from the front elevation, it would be set off the shared boundary by 1 metre to ensure there would not be a 'terracing effect' and the proposed render finish and front extension would ensure there is not a mix of brickwork. Arlesey Road has a very mixed street scene, with examples of development similar in appearance to the proposed development. It is considered on balance that the proposal, because of the material choices, and existing surrounding development is unlikely to result in any detrimental harm to the character and appearance of the area or the host dwelling. In terms of neighbouring amenity, proposed extensions would be sited approximately 1 metre from the shared boundaries with Nos.113 and 117 Arlesey Road. There is existing built form of outbuildings along the shared boundary belonging to No.117, and therefore this neighbouring dwelling would be sufficiently screened from the proposal. The proposed rear extension would bring the rear of the host dwelling in line with the rear elevation of No.113, as such this neighbouring dwelling will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposal in terms of loss of light or overbearing impact. In addition, there is a window proposed in the side elevation, which would serve a bathroom. A condition has been imposed to ensure that the window is obscurely glazed to ensure there is no loss of privacy to No.113. All other neighbouring dwellings are sufficiently separated and/or screened and would not be detrimentally impacted in terms of loss of light, loss of privacy or an overbearing impact. The proposal would increase the number of bedrooms at the property. A four-bedroom dwelling would be required to provide three off-street parking spaces. The application site benefits from a large driveway to the front of the property and therefore it is unlikely that the proposal will negatively impact the public highway or the off-street parking on site. Stotfold Town Council were consulted on the application and had no objection. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 5 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended. The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax. If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.�Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: http://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax/bands/find.aspxWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended. The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax. If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.�Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: http://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax/bands/find.aspx

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 13 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
9 Apr 2026
Comments by
20 May 2026
Site or press notice
24 Apr 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026