East Byre Bowes Barnard Castle DL12 9HU Data via plota.co.uk

DM/26/00750/TCA - Trees in a Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

The tree is an alder which has previously been pollared and reduced to a 2.5m stump.Consent is sought to remove the remaining stump and replant two silver birch trees along the boundary Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
25 Mar 2026
Consultation
26 Mar 2026
Approved
2 Apr 2026

Approved on 2 Apr 2026 · TPO/S211 (No objection) · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Bowes conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Trees in a Conservation Area
Postcode
DL12 9HU
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
25 Mar 2026
Ward
Upper Teesdale
Parish
Bowes
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 May 2026
Decision
Raise No Objection
Decision date
2 Apr 2026
Decision level
TPO/S211 (No objection)
Applicant
Show
Agent
CMF Planning and Design Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 8 days from validation, 27 days faster than Durham's median of 35 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 90% of tree and landscaping works here are.

96%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
238decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14803975
Consultation
26 Mar 2026
Comments by
16 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026