Kingshead The Ridgeway London NW7 1QX Data via plota.co.uk

TCP/0402/26 - Trees Decided

Proposal

1 x Twin Stemmed Lime (applicants ref. T1) - Reduce by 3m and thin by 20%. 1 x Ash (applicants ref. T2) - Reduce by 3m and thin by 20%. 1 x Field Maple (applicants ref. T3) - Reduce by no more than 2.5m over the whole crown and thin by 20% (amended descriptions) 2 x Ash (applicants ref. T4, T5) - Reduce to previous pollard points and thin crown density by 30%. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
15 Jul 2026
Trees: Not to make TPO
25 Aug 2026

Trees: Not to make TPO on 25 Aug 2026 · Last checked 2 Sept 2026

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Mill Hill conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
2 Article 4 directions
Article 4 for Mill Hill CA Area 3 · Article 4 Small Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) Area 1. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Archaeological priority area: An Acheulian hand axe was discovered here dating to the Neolithic period
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Barnet AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
7 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Wall and Decorative Iron Railings Extending From Wills Grove to Mill Hill School, Grade II, 51 m away · 7 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 7 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Barnet built-up area; Tree preservation order 23 m away: The London Borough of Barnet (Former site of Kingshead Public House/Cottages, The Ridgeway, N.W.7.) Tree Preservation Order 1981 made under The Town and Country Planning Acts, 1971 To 1974..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Barnet - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Barnet
Application type
Trees
Postcode
NW7 1QX
Received
15 Jul 2026
Validated
15 Jul 2026
Ward
Mill Hill
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Aug 2026
Decision
Trees: Not to make TPO
Decision date
25 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
The Landscape Garden Co Ltd

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 2 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15085683
Barnet
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#90 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Barnet is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #42 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Barnet is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Barnet decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
75%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #285 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #264 of 296
79%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #42 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #29 of 296
55%
Minor dwellings approved
319 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
21 decided (10+ homes)
41%
Change of use approved
132 decided
2,541
Total decisions
625 refused in the year to March 2026