Turkey Farm House Goudhurst Road Marden Kent TN12 9NP Data via plota.co.uk

26/501894/FULL - Full Withdrawn

Proposal

Erection of a double bay car port with storage bay and landscape alterations , including the formation of a replacement vehicular access following the existing alignment and passing over the bund, with no break or alteration to its continuity. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
19 May 2026
Consultation
16 Jun 2026
Withdrawn
6 Aug 2026

Withdrawn on 6 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Aug 2026

Site constraints 4

Grade II listed: Turkey Farm House
List entry 1060684 · 10 m from the pin
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Public footpath 21 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Maidstone - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Maidstone
Application type
Full
Postcode
TN12 9NP
Received
19 May 2026
Validated
19 May 2026
Ward
Marden And Yalding
Parish
Marden
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Jul 2026
Decision
Application Withdrawn
Decision date
6 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
James Clague Architects

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14926454
Site or press notice
16 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Maidstone
Planning Authority Score
7.1/10
Good
#58 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Maidstone is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #34 out of 296. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Maidstone decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #225 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #175 of 296
81%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #34 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #55 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
136 decided (1-9 homes)
75%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
44 decided
1,110
Total decisions
181 refused in the year to March 2026