Kanda Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ Data via plota.co.uk

26/00737/CLASAA - Part 1 Class AA (enlargement of a Refused
Change of useExtensions & alterationsNew homes

Proposal

Application for prior approval for the construction of one additional storey to the property with a maximum height of 0.42m. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Mar 2026
✗
Refused
23 Apr 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 23 Apr 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Documents 7

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF Prior approval required & refused class Councils Decision · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗

Statements & assessments 2

PDF Planning officers report Planning Officers Assessment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement Planning Statement · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 2

PDF Comments from cookham parish council planning committee Parish Council Comments · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour notification list Neighbour Notification List · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗

Other documents 2

PDF History log Property History · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Applicationformredacted Application Forms · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
the 1970s provisional farmland map had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

8 Jul 2026Pending

Lingerin Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ

Details required by Condition 15 (ASHP and PV) of planning permission 25/02431/F...

26/01670/CONDIT

Nearby new applications

8 Jul 2026Pending

Lingerin Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ

Details required by Condition 15 (ASHP and PV) of planning permission 25/02431/F...

26/01670/CONDIT

Important details

Council
Windsor and Maidenhead
Application type
Part 1 Class AA (enlargement of a
Postcode
SL6 9RQ
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
20 Mar 2026
Ward
Bisham And Cookham
Parish
Cookham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 May 2026
Decision
Prior Approval Required and Refused
Decision date
23 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Wouter De Jager

How this decision compares

Decided in 34 days from validation, 21 days faster than Windsor and Maidenhead's median of 55 for changes of use. Refused, as 44% of changes of use here are.

67%decided within 8 weeks
56%approved
64decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Windsor and Maidenhead in the last twelve months, from validation. Windsor and Maidenhead decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14760235
Comments by
21 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No

Historical activity at this location

17 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

This property

Previous applications at this address

2025 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey side extension…
25/02681/CPD
Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2025 Approved
Lingerin Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Erection of self-build replacement dwelling, new EV charger and access following demoliti…
25/02431/FULL
2025 Withdrawn
Lingerin Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Erection of self-build replacement dwelling, new EV charger and access following demoliti…
25/00207/FULL
2022 Approved
Linger In Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement dwelling.
22/00291/FULL
2019 Approved
Linger In Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement dwelling with associated driveway, following demolition of the existing dwell…
19/01601/FULL
2018 Refused
Linger In Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement dwelling including demolition of the existing outbuilding with associated dri…
18/02408/FULL
2018 Approved
March House Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Details required by condition 2 (external materials), 6 (construction management plan) an…
18/03013/CONDIT
2017 Approved
March House Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Construction of a single storey dwelling on stilts following demolition of existing dwell…
17/02925/FULL
2017 Approved
Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement dwelling following demolition of existing dwelling
17/00817/FULL
2017 Refused
Linger In Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Construction of a replacement dwelling.
17/01456/FULL
2016 Approved
Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed side extensions are lawful.
17/00204/CPD
2016 Approved
Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Single storey rear extension no greater than 8.0m depth, 3.2m high and an eaves height of…
16/03986/PDXL
2016 Withdrawn
Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement dwelling
16/01449/FULL
2016 Refused
Linger In Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Detached house with integral boathouse, associated parking with car port and new access f…
16/02624/FULL
2016 Approved
March House Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the replacement boat house is lawful.
16/01055/CPD
2016 Approved
March House Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Replacement slipway
16/01054/FULL
2016 Refused
March House Spade Oak Reach Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9RQ
Erection of single storey dwelling on stilts following demolition of existing house
16/01053/FULL
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings