Compton Grove Farm Compton Lane Collingham Wetherby LS22 5DS Data via plota.co.uk

26/04089/COND - Discharge of Conditions Refused

Proposal

Consent, agreement or approval required by condition 15 (Drainage) of Planning Application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
20 Jul 2026
Consultation
27 Jul 2026
Refused
6 Aug 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 6 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 11 Aug 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 15 refused

    • ConditionsConsent, agreement or approval required by condition 15 (Drainage)RefusedThis application26/04089/COND

Site constraints 2

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Leeds - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Leeds
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
LS22 5DS
Received
20 Jul 2026
Validated
20 Jul 2026
Ward
Harewood
Parish
Collingham-with-Linton Parish Council
Target decision
14 Sept 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
6 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Henszel Design Architects

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 11 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
27 Jul 2026
Comments by
17 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Leeds
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#131 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Leeds is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #95 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (85%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Leeds decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #238 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #249 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #95 of 296
33%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #78 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
208 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
36 decided (10+ homes)
68%
Change of use approved
279 decided
3,681
Total decisions
613 refused in the year to March 2026