Uppingham Community College London Road Uppingham Rutland LE15 9TJ Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0492/FUL - Full Application Registered

Proposal

Construction of ten covered padel courts, installation of modular containers, associated landscaping, car parking, and drainage infrastructure. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
29 Apr 2026
Consultation
27 Jul 2026
Decision
Expected by 15 Jul 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 10 Aug 2026; it is now day 138. The consultation period closed on 10 Aug 2026.

Documents 45

Consultation & comments 34

PDF CONSULTEE - PUBLIC PROTECTION Representations · 10 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - SPORT ENGLAND Representations · 30 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - CHURCH VIEW HOUSE, 6A CHURCH LANE, LYDDINGTON Representations · 19 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - LYDDINGTON PARISH COUNCIL Representations · 11 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 33 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 95 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 97 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - CHURCH VIEW HOUSE (TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYS) Representations · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - CHURCH VIEW HOUSE, 6A CHURCH LANE, LYDDINGTON Representations · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - CHURCH VIEW HOUSE, 6A CHURCH LANE, LYDDINGTON Representations · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - HOME PADDOCK, WINDMILL WAY, LYDDINGTON Representations · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF APPLICANT RESPONSE TO SPORT ENGLAND OBJECTION Correspondence · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 97 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 48 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 95 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 5 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 12 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - WREN HOUSE, 1 GRETTON ROAD, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 6B MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - LYNDON HOUSE, 59 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 97 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 28 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - SPORT ENGLAND Representations · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - 95 MAIN STREET, LYDDINGTON Representations · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF INTERESTED PARTY - RABBITS LODGE, SOUTH LUFFENHAM Representations · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - ARCHAEOLOGY Representations · 20 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - HSE Representations · 20 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - HIGHWAYS Representations · 20 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - UPPINGHAM TOWN COUNCIL Representations · 14 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE -CADENT PLANS Representations · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - CADENT Representations · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - NATIONAL GAS Representations · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - HSE Representations · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE - HSE Representations · 6 May 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rutland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rutland
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
LE15 9TJ
Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
29 Apr 2026
Ward
Uppingham Ward
Parish
Uppingham Town Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Chaplin Farrant Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 138, past the statutory target. 91% of full applications in Rutland are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 12 Sept 2026.

Day 13882 days past the 56-day target
76%decided within 8 weeks
83%approved
142decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Rutland in the last twelve months, from validation. Rutland decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 12 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14842934
Consultation
27 Jul 2026
Comments by
10 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
20 May 2026
Statutory expiry
24 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rutland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#93 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rutland is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #87 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rutland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #142 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #164 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #87 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #91 of 296
65%
Minor dwellings approved
43 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
24 decided
520
Total decisions
57 refused in the year to March 2026