Land To The North Of Mount Lane Springwell Gateshead Data via plota.co.uk

26/00156/AM1 - Non Material Amendment to Full Permisson Current

Proposal

Non-material amendment to previously approved application to remove above-ground control building, relocate crane pad and widen access track, amend perimeter fencing details, change shape of SuDS features, add fence to SuDS pond, introduce new access covers and hardstanding around below ground inlet chambers (additional drainage info received). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
21 Jan 2026
Consultation
15 May 2026
Decision
Expected by 18 Feb 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 18 Feb 2026.

Documents 20

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    VariationApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 14 discharged

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Tyne and Wear
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Scheduled monument 145 m away: Bowes Railway
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Sunderland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Sunderland
Application type
Non Material Amendment to Full Permisson
Received
21 Jan 2026
Validated
21 Jan 2026
Ward
Washington West
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Feb 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Lichfields

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 5 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14606450
Consultation
15 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Sunderland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#94 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Sunderland ranks #99 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Sunderland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #101 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #119 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #99 of 296
37%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #123 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
84%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
66%
Change of use approved
58 decided
581
Total decisions
54 refused in the year to March 2026