4 Dagmar Mews Auckland Road East Southsea PO5 2HF Data via plota.co.uk

26/00823/HOU - Householder Planning Application Refused

Proposal

Installation of garage door (following removal of existing) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
20 Jul 2026
Validated
22 Jul 2026
Consultation
30 Jul 2026
Refused
1 Sept 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 1 Sept 2026 · Fully Delegated Decision · Last checked 3 Sept 2026

Site constraints 5

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
The Sea Front, Southsea conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Registered park or garden 57 m away: Southsea Common
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
12 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: 14 and 16, Villiers Road, Grade II, 57 m away · 12 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 12 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Portsmouth built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Portsmouth - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Portsmouth
Application type
Householder Planning Application
Postcode
PO5 2HF
Received
20 Jul 2026
Validated
22 Jul 2026
Ward
St Jude
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Sept 2026
Decision
Refuse
Decision date
1 Sept 2026
Decision level
Fully Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 41 days from validation, 14 days faster than Portsmouth's median of 55 for extensions. Refused, as 14% of extensions here are.

62%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
197decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Portsmouth in the last twelve months, from validation. Portsmouth decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

29 neighbours consulted · Last counted 3 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15078882
Neighbours
30 Jul 2026
Comments by
28 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
31 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Portsmouth
Planning Authority Score
3.1/10
Poor
#232 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Portsmouth ranks #188 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Portsmouth decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #196 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #207 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #188 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #217 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
44 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
77%
Change of use approved
99 decided
613
Total decisions
85 refused in the year to March 2026