7 First Avenue, Dunstable, LU6 3AJ Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/01955/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Single storey front extension Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
19 Jun 2026
Approved

Approved on · Last checked 11 Sept 2026

Site constraints 1

Also on the record
Inside the Dunstable built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
LU6 3AJ
Received
19 Jun 2026
Validated
19 Jun 2026
Parish
Dunstable
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Aug 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons For Granting The application site is a detached bungalow located along First Avenue in Dunstable. The surrounding are is characterised by two storey properties with a variety of forward projections at both the single storey and two storey levels. The proposal consists of a single storey front extension measuring a width of 4.3m, a depth of 3.9m and a pitched roof measuring an eaves height of 3m and a ridge height of 5m. The proposed extension would be a highly visible addition to the main dwellinghouse, and would match an existing front projection on the main dwellinghouse. These matching roof pitches would create a sympathetic design which, alongside the modest size of the proposal, would not be considered to lead to any harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling. Additionally, the streetscene of First Avenue is characterised by a mixture of development styles, and therefore the addition of a further front extension to the host dwelling would not be at odds with the existing grain and pattern of development within the streetscene. The proposed extension would be obscured from the adjacent neighbour to the east (5 First Avenue) by an existing forward projection on the application site. As such, the proposed extension would not lead to any detrimental impacts to the amenities of this neighbour. However, the proposed extension would be visible to the adjacent property to the west (9 First Avenue). It is noted that this neighbouring property benefits from a ground floor window along the side elevation facing towards the application site. Although this proposed extension would lead to an increased impact onto this side window, it is noted that this proposed extension would remain separated by some 3m. Additionally, the proposal would not include any side windows facing this neighbour, and therefore the proposal would not lead to any mutual overlooking impacts between the two neighbour. Therefore, despite the proximity of the extension to this adjacent neighbour and window, the separation distance and single storey nature of the proposal would negate any significantly detrimental impacts on the amenities of this adjacent neighbour. All other properties are considered to be sufficiently separated from the application site for there to be any material impacts. The proposal would include the addition of a bedroom on the application site, bringing the number of bedrooms on the sit to two. Under the Parking Standards for New Developments SPD (2023), a two bedroomed dwelling would require two parking spaces to be provided on the site.The application site contains a driveway and area of hardstanding which would be able to provide adequate parking provision for two parking spaces. Therefore, this proposal would remain in conformity with Policies T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan. An Archaeology Officer was consulted on this application, who noted that the site lies close to the core to the historic centre of Dunstable, and therefore, the application site has the potential to contain heritage assets or archaeological remains. However, due to the scale of the proposal, it is not considered that this proposal would have any impacts on any surviving archaeological remains, and no objection has been raised to the proposal. Dunstable Town Council were consulted on this application, and raised no objection. This application was also subject to a public and neighbouring consultation, and no representations were received. Given the siting, design and scale of the proposal it is not considered that this application would lead to any detrimental impacts on the character and appearance on the surrounding area. Additionally, the proposal would not lead to detrimental harm to the residential amenities of adjacent neighbouring properties. Therefore, the proposal would remain in conformity with Policy HQ1 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide and Section 12 of the NPPF.Reasons For Granting The application site is a detached bungalow located along First Avenue in Dunstable. The surrounding are is characterised by two storey properties with a variety of forward projections at both the single storey and two storey levels. The proposal consists of a single storey front extension measuring a width of 4.3m, a depth of 3.9m and a pitched roof measuring an eaves height of 3m and a ridge height of 5m. The proposed extension would be a highly visible addition to the main dwellinghouse, and would match an existing front projection on the main dwellinghouse. These matching roof pitches would create a sympathetic design which, alongside the modest size of the proposal, would not be considered to lead to any harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling. Additionally, the streetscene of First Avenue is characterised by a mixture of development styles, and therefore the addition of a further front extension to the host dwelling would not be at odds with the existing grain and pattern of development within the streetscene. The proposed extension would be obscured from the adjacent neighbour to the east (5 First Avenue) by an existing forward projection on the application site. As such, the proposed extension would not lead to any detrimental impacts to the amenities of this neighbour. However, the proposed extension would be visible to the adjacent property to the west (9 First Avenue). It is noted that this neighbouring property benefits from a ground floor window along the side elevation facing towards the application site. Although this proposed extension would lead to an increased impact onto this side window, it is noted that this proposed extension would remain separated by some 3m. Additionally, the proposal would not include any side windows facing this neighbour, and therefore the proposal would not lead to any mutual overlooking impacts between the two neighbour. Therefore, despite the proximity of the extension to this adjacent neighbour and window, the separation distance and single storey nature of the proposal would negate any significantly detrimental impacts on the amenities of this adjacent neighbour. All other properties are considered to be sufficiently separated from the application site for there to be any material impacts. The proposal would include the addition of a bedroom on the application site, bringing the number of bedrooms on the sit to two. Under the Parking Standards for New Developments SPD (2023), a two bedroomed dwelling would require two parking spaces to be provided on the site.The application site contains a driveway and area of hardstanding which would be able to provide adequate parking provision for two parking spaces. Therefore, this proposal would remain in conformity with Policies T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan. An Archaeology Officer was consulted on this application, who noted that the site lies close to the core to the historic centre of Dunstable, and therefore, the application site has the potential to contain heritage assets or archaeological remains. However, due to the scale of the proposal, it is not considered that this proposal would have any impacts on any surviving archaeological remains, and no objection has been raised to the proposal. Dunstable Town Council were consulted on this application, and raised no objection. This application was also subject to a public and neighbouring consultation, and no representations were received. Given the siting, design and scale of the proposal it is not considered that this application would lead to any detrimental impacts on the character and appearance on the surrounding area. Additionally, the proposal would not lead to detrimental harm to the residential amenities of adjacent neighbouring properties. Therefore, the proposal would remain in conformity with Policy HQ1 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide and Section 12 of the NPPF. 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 5 )Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk.Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk. 6 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 11 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
19 Jun 2026
Comments by
25 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
4 Aug 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026