23, Taggs Yard, Woodlands Road, London, SW13 0JZ Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/2625 - Works to Trees Under TPO Recommendation under review

Proposal

Silver Birch in Driveway, 23 Woodlands Road, london SW13 0JZ Having consulted two tree surgeons (Mark Spriggs and Jo Buckingham ( HTS Hardy Tree Surgeons)) I am applying for permission to remove the silver birch in the driveway, as well as the nearby holly tree. The Silver Birch (which was already mature when we purchased the property in 2000)., is approaching end of life, lost its crown in a storm approx 15 years ago and has shed additional limbs, one of which is curently hanging, held in place by dead climbing rose. The two leaders and side limbs are in danger of falling due to further decay evident in the trunk, and present a danger to the neighbour's garden (where young children play) as well as to users of the driveway, the propoerty's only access. Consideration has been given to weight reduction, but given the tree age and trunk condition this is not considered appropriate. We would be happy to leave the stump (and if desired some of the trunk left standing) in place so it can decay naturally over time to provide further habitat. Photographs of the tree, trunk and hanging branch are provided. The trees within the driveway are all self-seeded and have grown naturally, with consequent integrity. We do not think the narrow verge available, given also the lack of natural watering and need to keep the driveway trimmed back for access, is suitable for planting large trees, and if re-planting is required we would prefer to use suitable hedge species rather than replace like for like. Within the wider context of the garden we have in the past 20 years planted silver birch (two survive) and various cherries, gages and other trees. We have two large trees subject to TPO, (oak and sycamore) and do not believe it would be suitable to plant additional large trees - the garden already being well provided with trees and shrubs which support considerable wildlife. While work is undertaken on the birch we would also like to deal with the holly, which is in poor condition - one of the twin trunks is dead, while the other only supports a few side branches in poor condition. We woudl like permission to reduce this to a short standing trunk, to see if thereby we can encourage fresh growth from the base as part of the driveway hedge. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
28 Jul 2026
Validated
29 Jul 2026
Decision
Awaiting decision

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet.

Site constraints 25

Heritage

Article 4 direction

Environment & risk

Floodzone 2 Fluvial / Tidal ModelsFloodzone 2 Tidal ModelsFloodzone 3 - Fluvial / Tidal ModelsFloodzone 3 - Fluvial ModelsFloodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsRichm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 75%Surface water flood risk

Planning designations

Cadent Pipeline 120m bufferRichm Bank Top Planing App ToolRichm Protected View (Indicative Zone) RICHMOND PARK TOWARDS ST PAULS CATHEDRALRichm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prRichm Village Boundary Barnes VillageRichm Village Character Area Barnes Common - Character Area 5 & Conservation ARichm Village Character Area Priests Bridge - Character Area 8Richmond CA - CA32 Barnes CommonRichmond CIL HigherSFRA Zone 3b -T0529 - T3 - Silver BirchT0529 - T4 - Silver BirchT0529 - T5 - Silver BirchT0529 - T6 - Common OakT0529 - T7 - SycamoreWands Takeaway Restrict: Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around

Constraints recorded by the council for this site. Documents on the council site ↗

Work with planning data? Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Trees Under TPO
Postcode
SW13 0JZ
Received
28 Jul 2026
Validated
29 Jul 2026
Ward
Mortlake & Barnes Common Ward [MRB]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15116198
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026