The Grange Radwinter Saffron Walden Essex CB10 2TF Data via plota.co.uk

UTT/26/0780/NMA - Non Material Amendment Approved

Proposal

Non material amendment to - removal of conditions 4 (biodiversity enhancement strategy), 5 (habitat management and monitoring plan) and 6 (biodiversity gain plan), all imposed in error Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
23 Mar 2026
Approved
10 Apr 2026

Approved on 10 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 4, 5, 6 varied

    • AmendmentNon material amendment - removal of conditions 4 (biodiversity enhancement strategy), 5…This applicationUTT/26/0780/NMA

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 45 m away: Traditional orchard.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Uttlesford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Uttlesford
Application type
Non Material Amendment
Postcode
CB10 2TF
Received
23 Mar 2026
Validated
23 Mar 2026
Ward
The Sampfords
Parish
Radwinter
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 Apr 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
10 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
FWAG East Consultancy Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Env. assessment
No
Uttlesford
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#95 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Uttlesford is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #31 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Uttlesford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Uttlesford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #280 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #272 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #31 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #33 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
276 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
28 decided
1,247
Total decisions
288 refused in the year to March 2026