Spring Hall Mount, Binn Lane, Marsden, Huddersfield, HD7 6NW Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Discharge of details reserved by condition 3 (noise management plan) on previous permission for change of use from annex to holiday let Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
30 Jun 2026
Validated
1 Jul 2026
Approved
26 Aug 2026

Approved on 26 Aug 2026 · Last checked 6 Sept 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions details submitted for 3

    • ConditionsDischarge of details reserved by condition 3 (noise management plan) on previous for change…This application2026/91824

Site constraints 3

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 5
Very poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Predicted from the national soil map. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Kirklees - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Kirklees
Postcode
HD7 6NW
Received
30 Jun 2026
Validated
1 Jul 2026
Ward
Colne Valley
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Aug 2026
Decision
DISCHARGE OF CONDITION(S) APPROVED
Decision date
26 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show
Kirklees
Planning Authority Score
2.6/10
Poor
#249 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Kirklees is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #251 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 62% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Kirklees decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #86 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #131 of 296
46%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #251 of 296
62%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #274 of 296
86%
Minor dwellings approved
248 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
41 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
71 decided
1,779
Total decisions
151 refused in the year to March 2026