214 Melton Road Edwalton Nottinghamshire NG12 4BS Data via plota.co.uk

26/00735/NMA - Non Material Minor Amendment Decided

Proposal

Non material amendment for so the left side of the first floor extension matches the right side. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
24 Apr 2026
Non Material Minor Amendment DISAGREE
21 May 2026

Non Material Minor Amendment DISAGREE on 21 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 3, 4 awaiting decision

Site constraints 2

Edwalton conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
Inside the West Bridgford built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Non Material Minor Amendment
Postcode
NG12 4BS
Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
24 Apr 2026
Ward
Edwalton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 May 2026
Decision
Non Material Minor Amendment DISAGREE
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026