32 Frith Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 4EY Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear infill extension which would extend 6.00m beyond the original rear wall of the existing dwelling with a maximum height of 3.00m and an eaves height of 2.85m. Data via plota.co.uk
Last checked
Site constraints 4
Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.
Every application in Waltham Forest - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.
Other new applications on this street
Nearby new applications
Rear Flat, 28 Ruckholt Road, Leyton, London, E10 5NP
Construction of single storey rear extension and a dormer roof extension to main...
65 Grove Green Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 4EG
Construction of a single storey wraparound rear extension.
16 Goodall Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 4EP
Joint application for the construction of single storey ground floor rear extens...
95 Calderon Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 4ET
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) - Construction of roof extension above...
14 Goodall Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 4EP
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) - Construction of dormer roof extensio...
132 Colegrave Road Stratford London E15 1EA
Application for a lawful development certificate (proposed) for the erection of ...
Historical activity at this location
25 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Nearby activity
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #80 out of 296. Only 22% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.
