Land South Of Bedwell Road Ugley Data via plota.co.uk

UTT/26/0785/FUL - Fully Detailed Approved

Proposal

S73 application to vary condition 20 (biodiversity net gain design stage report) and condition 18 Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP: Biodiversity) of (allowed at appeal Ref: APP/) (Outline application for up to 50 market and affordable dwellings, public open space and associated highways and drainage infrastructure - all matters reserved except access.) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
30 Mar 2026
Consultation
2 Jul 2026
Approved
11 Sept 2026

Approved on 11 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 11 Sept 2026

Documents 34

Consultation & comments 22

PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - REVISED RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 8 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF WWA LANDSCAPE - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 24 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF AERODROME SAFEGUARDING - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 21 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 20 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF NHS ESSEX - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 14 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ECC HIGHWAYS - COMMENTS B900-AP Consultation Replies · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF NATS - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 6 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF UDC HOUSING - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 6 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF SPORT ENGLAND - COMMENTS B900-AP Consultation Replies · 6 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ANGLIAN WATER - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF AFFINITY WATER - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SPORT ENGLAND - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF EXOLUM PIPELINE SYSTEM - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ANGLIAN WATER - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAA AERODROME SAFEGUARDING - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ECC HIGHWAYS - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF NHS ESSEX ICB - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF GIGACLEAR LTD - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CADENT GAS - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF UKPN - RESPONSE B900-AP Consultation Replies · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 3

Priority habitat: No main habitat but additional habitats present
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Uttlesford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Uttlesford
Application type
Fully Detailed
Postcode
CM22 6HG
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Ward
Stort Valley
Parish
Ugley
Case officer
Show
Target decision
11 Sept 2026
Decision
Approve with Conditions
Decision date
11 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Pegasus Group

Public comments

No public comments yet.

195 neighbours consulted · Last counted 11 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14788286
Neighbours
2 Jul 2026
Consultation
2 Jul 2026
Comments by
30 Jul 2026
Site or press notice
10 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
29 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Uttlesford
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#95 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Uttlesford is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #31 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Uttlesford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Uttlesford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #280 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #272 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #31 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #33 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
276 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
28 decided
1,247
Total decisions
288 refused in the year to March 2026