Chevin Mount, Farnah Green, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 2UP Data via plota.co.uk

Pending TRE/2026/0958
Date received
29 Jul 2026
Date validated
29 Jul 2026
Postcode
DE56 2UP

Description

Permission is requested to carry out work as follows: T1. Weeping Ash - To remove dead wood and tidy up the stragglers on the canopy. T2. Group of large Pine trees (I believe these are some of the trees specified in TPO468/22) - To clear the hangers from on the phone line, remove dead wood and to tidy up and create a good shape to all of the canopies using minimal cuts. T3. Horse chestnut - Raise the crown to 4m T4. Cherry - Raise the crown to 4m and take off 4m from the top canopy to reduce it in size while maintaining a good shape, using good pruning cuts. T5. Large chestnut tree - This tree is in poor condition. Permission was previously granted to dismantle it but the work was not carried out within the specified time frame. Permission is requested to fell the entire tree before it falls. Data via plota.co.uk

Last checked

Decision outlook

Plota predicted a decision around 15 Sept 2026; it is now day 48.

Day 48, past Amber Valley's usual 37 days for tree and landscaping works. 99% are decided within thirteen weeks, so most likely by 28 Oct 2026.

Day 488 days to the 56-day target
93%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
105decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Amber Valley in the last twelve months, from validation. Amber Valley decision record →

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Amber Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service
Amber Valley
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#50 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Amber Valley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #74 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Amber Valley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #6 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #9 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #74 of 296
41%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #157 of 296
88%
Minor dwellings approved
77 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
96%
Change of use approved
48 decided
657
Total decisions
26 refused in the year to March 2026