The Square Peninsula Square Winchester Hampshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/01553/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Current

Proposal

T63 Cherry. Fell. The cherry tree is in decline, with one of the co-dominant stems now dead. The remaining crown has become overextended, and several branches are in direct contact with the adjacent building. Justification While it would be possible to reduce the crown to provide clearance, the extent of pruning required would be significant and would result in a poor, unbalanced appearance due to the tree's previous history of inappropriate pruning. Such works would not represent good arboricultural practice and are unlikely to provide a sustainable long-term solution. Given the tree's declining condition, the dead co-dominant stem, its proximity to the building, and the limited scope for sympathetic pruning, removal of the tree is recommended. T41 Sycamore, having experienced two recent branch failures. It is located at the base of a bank, adjacent to a busy public footpath and near other mature trees. Justification The crown contains mostly elongated, overextended lateral branches with a leggy form, which are considered to have contributed to the recent branch failures. To reduce the likelihood of further failures and improve the tree's structural integrity, it is proposed to reduce the affected overextended branches by up to 4m. Pruning cuts will not exceed 55mm in stem diameter and all works will be undertaken in accordance with BS 3998(2010) ? Tree Work Recommendations, retaining the tree's natural form and amenity value while reducing end-weight on the elongated limbs. T55 Yew Reduce the height of the yew by no more than 2.5m (approximately 20% of the crown height) and reduce the lateral canopy spread by up to 2 metres to re-establish a compact, well-balanced crown and provide a sustainable framework for future management. Justification The tree has developed an overextended crown with elongated branch growth beyond its natural form. The proposed reduction will restore a more compact and proportionate canopy, reducing leverage on extended limbs while… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
29 Jul 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Decision
Awaiting decision

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet.

Work with planning data? Every application in Winchester - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Winchester
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Received
29 Jul 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Ward
ST MICHAEL WARD
Parish
Winchester Town
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show
Agent
Arbor Call Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15119375
Env. assessment
No
Winchester
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#177 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Winchester is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #213 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Winchester decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #72 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #47 of 296
55%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #213 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #230 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
32 decided
918
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026