The Square Peninsula Square Winchester Hampshire Data via plota.co.uk
Proposal
T63 Cherry. Fell. The cherry tree is in decline, with one of the co-dominant stems now dead. The remaining crown has become overextended, and several branches are in direct contact with the adjacent building. Justification While it would be possible to reduce the crown to provide clearance, the extent of pruning required would be significant and would result in a poor, unbalanced appearance due to the tree's previous history of inappropriate pruning. Such works would not represent good arboricultural practice and are unlikely to provide a sustainable long-term solution. Given the tree's declining condition, the dead co-dominant stem, its proximity to the building, and the limited scope for sympathetic pruning, removal of the tree is recommended. T41 Sycamore, having experienced two recent branch failures. It is located at the base of a bank, adjacent to a busy public footpath and near other mature trees. Justification The crown contains mostly elongated, overextended lateral branches with a leggy form, which are considered to have contributed to the recent branch failures. To reduce the likelihood of further failures and improve the tree's structural integrity, it is proposed to reduce the affected overextended branches by up to 4m. Pruning cuts will not exceed 55mm in stem diameter and all works will be undertaken in accordance with BS 3998(2010) ? Tree Work Recommendations, retaining the tree's natural form and amenity value while reducing end-weight on the elongated limbs. T55 Yew Reduce the height of the yew by no more than 2.5m (approximately 20% of the crown height) and reduce the lateral canopy spread by up to 2 metres to re-establish a compact, well-balanced crown and provide a sustainable framework for future management. Justification The tree has developed an overextended crown with elongated branch growth beyond its natural form. The proposed reduction will restore a more compact and proportionate canopy, reducing leverage on extended limbs while… Data via plota.co.uk
Application progress
This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet.
Documents 2
Plans & drawings 1
Application forms 1
Work with planning data? Every application in Winchester - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service
Important details
- Council
- Winchester
- Application type
- Tree Preservation Order
- Received
- 29 Jul 2026
- Validated
- 5 Aug 2026
- Ward
- ST MICHAEL WARD
- Parish
- Winchester Town
- Case officer
- Show
- Applicant
- Show
- Agent
- Arbor Call Ltd
Consultation & key dates
- Alt. reference
- PP-15119375
- Env. assessment
- No
Winchester is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #213 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).
Track this application
The Square Peninsula Square Winchester Hampshire
Tracking this application
Not there in a minute? Check junk - especially Hotmail and Outlook.
Go to your dashboard →Sign in to view contact details
Applicant and case-officer names are hidden from public view for privacy. Create a free Plota account - or sign back in - and we'll show them, plus you get a dashboard for alerts and tracked applications.
