Cliff Cottage Kings Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9AY Data via plota.co.uk

26/01072/TPO - Works To Trees Covered by TPO Approved

Proposal

T1 Cupressus macrocarpa - Remove the specific split/fractured branches identified in the photos (those with fracture points and hazard beam features) though some are currently propped by adjacent stems; taking these out cleanly may expose additional weaknesses above, so these limbs are to be reduced. Once those defects are removed, undertake an end weight reduction to newly exposed or compromised sections to restore structural balance as follows: South and West aspects (over Cliff Cottage): approx. 2.5-3.5m on the over extended and compromised sections only. East aspect: approx. 1.5- 2.0m where limbs extend beyond the general crown outline. Height: approx. 1.5-2.0m on select leaders only if required to re balance following defect removals. North aspect: minimal intervention beyond defect removal and deadwood, as this side is already thinned by the failure. Prune to give up to 3m clearance above ground level, 3m clearance to the roof, and 0.5m clearance over the hedges. Remove major dead branches as specified. (012/2018/TPO). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
30 Apr 2026
Approved
1 Jun 2026

Approved on 1 Jun 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Important details

Application type
Works To Trees Covered by TPO
Postcode
SL6 9AY
Received
30 Apr 2026
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Ward
Bisham And Cookham
Parish
Cookham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Jun 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14899615
Env. assessment
No
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026